The following is a summary of
The Misunderstood Jew by Amy-Jill Levine ---a self-described "Yankee Jewish feminist who teaches in a predominantly
Protestant divinity school in the buckle of the Bible Belt"---which I wrote up for a friend recently. If you haven't read the book, it's definitely worth getting. (It makes a good holiday gift too!)
Introduction (
available online via Google Books)
- Levine introduces herself and her background and explains why the
Jewish background of Jesus and the New Testament (NT) is important to
everyone.
1) Jesus and Judaism - Discusses Jesus's positive
relationship to Judaism and debunks a number of common misconceptions
about Jesus's practice and about the Judaism of his time.
2) From Jewish Sect to Gentile Church - Discusses Jesus's followers and the development of the church
3) The New Testament and Anti-Judaism - Addresses (and for
the most part refutes) the accusation that the New Testament is
anti-Semitic or contains anti-Semitic passages.
4) Stereotyping Judaism - Addresses seven all-too-common misperceptions/stereotypes/slanders of first-century Judaism. These are things which are still taught from pulpits and in Bible studies! Here's the list:
- The view that Jewish Law was impossible to follow, a burden no one could bear.
- The thesis that all Jews wanted a warrior messiah who would defeat Rome.
- The proclamation that Jesus was a feminist in a women-hating Jewish culture.
- The conclusion that Jews were obsessed with keeping themselves pure
from the contamination of outsiders, whereas Jesus, especially through
his parable of the good Samaritan, broke through purity-based barriers.
-
The insistence that first-century Judaism was marked by a Temple
domination system that oppressed the poor and women and that promoted
social division between insiders and outsiders.
- The assertion
that Jews are narrow, clannish, particularistic, and xenophobic, whereas
Jesus and the church are engaged in universal outreach.
- The increasingly popular argument that the New Testament is not talking about Jews at all, but about "Judeans."
5) With Friends Like These
. . . - Discusses anti-Jewish prejudices in the church and its
educational systems; focuses specifically on Liberation Theology, the
World Council of Churches, the phrase "The Rabbis,"
multiculturally-oriented biblical studies which uses first-century
Judaism as foil by which to criticize practices of the dominant culture,
references to "the God of Judaism," and claims about "Jesus the
Palestinian."
6) Distinct Canons, Distinct Practices - Discusses the
different canons of Judaism and Christianity, as well as key differing
interpretations and practices; then criticizes certain types of
Jewish/Christian interfaith ventures (Christian Passover seders) while commending others (interfaith dialogue?).
7) Quo Vadis? - 26 (letters A. through Z.) specific
suggestions for ways for Christians and Jews to think, talk, and behave
that can help bring correction to all that's been discussed prior in the
book.
Epilogue - "If Isaac and Ishmael, and Jacob and Esau, can
learn to live together in peace, there is hope not only for the
responsible and the prodigal; there is hope for church and synagogue as
well. And if the church and synagogue both could recognize their
connection to Jesus, a Jewish prophet who spoke to Jews, perhaps we'd be
in a better place for understanding."
There is a group of scholars within what is known as the Radical Perspective on Paul (i.e. Paul as a Torah-observant Jewish apostle to the Gentiles) who are asking similar questions specifically in the context of the Pauline corpus. William S. Campbell, Kathy Ehrensberger, and J. Brian Tucker are all exploring ways in which Gentile identity is both continued, transformed, and reinvented in Paul’s ministry as evidenced in his letters.
Campbell’s book Paul and the Creation of Christian Identity (pictured above) is a significant contribution to this effort and worth reading.** Also, J. Brian Tucker has a book on the continuation of social identities in 1 Corinthians called "Remain in Your Calling" (pictured at right).
There are also a number of papers by J. Brian Tucker available for free on mjstudies.com:
* Paul goes on to address the Ephesians using a form known as a household code (see Eph. 5.21-6.9), a Roman religio-cultural value system which is structured around the father. Some interpreters think Paul transforms the household code away from its normal patriarchalism in the way he gives specific instructions not only to wives, children, and slaves, but also to husbands, fathers, and masters. To the degree that household codes are a particularly Greco-Roman way of addressing issues of order in families and households, this is relevant to the discussion at hand.
** Don't trip up over Campbell's use of the term "Christian." He is part of a cadre of Pauline scholars who are well aware of the anachronism. Of course, you can if you want. I'm just saying I think it would be counter-productive.